It takes two observers to make reality, the wall of patterns is the first observation, the second is the measuring device.
With both observations seperated in time/space, reality is possible.
What if only one scientist observes both measurements?
The results are the same, because he is observing two moments in time/space.
The issue is time, and our perception of it is flawed.
To those that are saying the instrument is causing some sort of distortion, remember that the physicists (arguably some of the most intelligent people in the world) would have thought of that first, and tried another means of measurement. If I could post the explodingheadguy gif, I would.
This video tries to “dumb down” a complicated scientific concept and misrepresents what is actually happening. Cut two holes in a piece of paper and shine a light through it. And what you see are two slits on the wall, not bands. The bands refer to the sums of the PROBABILITIES in determining which hole light passes through and has the same appearance as those of waves. Light is a particle, not a wave. But it’s probabilities that we measure for certain outcomes/events is the same as waves.
He’s talking about electrons not light waves. You’ve missed the point this guy has a PHD I don’t think he is misrepresenting anything. You just missed the point. Never were light waves mentioned in the entire video.
OMG i said exactly the same thin in physics..!!
great mind think a like
It takes two observers to make reality, the wall of patterns is the first observation, the second is the measuring device.
With both observations seperated in time/space, reality is possible.
What if only one scientist observes both measurements?
The results are the same, because he is observing two moments in time/space.
The issue is time, and our perception of it is flawed.
so ur telling me that u ca explain how observing, not interfering but observing can change the way the laws of physics work, think it over
To those that are saying the instrument is causing some sort of distortion, remember that the physicists (arguably some of the most intelligent people in the world) would have thought of that first, and tried another means of measurement. If I could post the explodingheadguy gif, I would.
Wow!!!
WHAT? AN INTERFERENCE PATTERN!
: D
if you like this watch all the “down the rabbit hole” shows there amazing
Maybe it’s the observer’s tools that influenced the particle. Gosh, you can’t be that stupid to not see this coming.
observing IS interfering. google “heisenberg’s uncertainty principle”.
think it over yourself
This video tries to “dumb down” a complicated scientific concept and misrepresents what is actually happening. Cut two holes in a piece of paper and shine a light through it. And what you see are two slits on the wall, not bands. The bands refer to the sums of the PROBABILITIES in determining which hole light passes through and has the same appearance as those of waves. Light is a particle, not a wave. But it’s probabilities that we measure for certain outcomes/events is the same as waves.
He’s talking about electrons not light waves. You’ve missed the point this guy has a PHD I don’t think he is misrepresenting anything. You just missed the point. Never were light waves mentioned in the entire video.