Sub-Orbital Space Flights & Satellite Exploration
How do you get “Martian jet lag” without going to Mars? Steve Squyres, leader of the Mars Exploration Rovers mission, knows a thing or two about living life on “Martian time.”
Tags: Mars, astronomy, science, rovers
April 23, Thursday 2009 8 am – STS-125 Video B-Roll Feed – JSC (All Channels) 9 am – STS-125 Program, Mission and Spacewalk Briefing – JSC (All Channels) 10:30 am – Hubble Space Telescope Program and Science Overview Briefing – HQ (All Channels) 2 pm – STS-125 Crew News Conference – JSC (All Channels)
Tags: Telescope, Hubble, Briefing, Overview
Now you can watch how easy it is to own, install, and operate your very own Jupiter Alkaline Ionized Water system. Part 5 of 6 of the Jupiter Venus JP107 Installation DVD. For more info, go to shop.snyderhealth.com
Tags: science, machine, Venus, kyk
SPACEWALKING astronauts have upgraded the Hubble telescope for the first time in seven years, equipping the 19-year-old stargazer with a powerful new camera and science computer. The seven hour outing by John Grunsfeld and Drew Feustel, members of the seven-strong space shuttle Atlantis crew, marked the first of five daily spacewalks by the astronauts. “We gave Hubble a hug, and true to form Hubble gave us a few curves,” Grunsfeld, a 50-year-old astronomer making his third visit to the telescope, more than any other astronaut. Feustel, a 43-year-old geologist and a rookie astronaut, provided the muscle that freed a balk bolt that threatened to prevent the spacewalks from removing the telescope’s main camera and replace it with a more capable one. “I don’t normally reveal my age, but I can tell you I’m five years older than when I came to work this morning,” David Lechrone, nasa’s chief Hubble astronomer, told a news briefing. “I hope the rest of the mission goes a little bit smoother.”
Tags: astronauts, WALK, upgrade, Camera
The Cassiopeia A supernova remnant seen expanding over the course of seven years. Looking for more videos about space? Visit dsc.discovery.com Credit: NASA/CXC/MIT/T.Delaney et al.
Tags: cas, cas-a, astronomy, x-ray
This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed. www.youtube.com
Tags: ADAMS, science, HISTORY, Earth
This is a clip from the DVD available at www.nealadams.com Neal Adams Science Project – Mars
Tags: HERE, KNOW, ARE, War
Alom Shaha goes behind the scenes of the cavernous Large Hadron Collider at CERN to explain why so many scientists are pinning their hopes on this experiment’s potential to answer some of the biggest questions in science. … seed science cern brian cox alom shaha physics geneva ALICE big bang
Tags: Bang, Geneva, alom, seed
11.08.07 House Science Committee hearing
Tags: Comet, science, meteor, atkins
This is a clip from the DVD available at www.nealadams.com Neal Adams Science Project Pangea
Tags: bush, science, IS, ARE
visit the fact movie at www.gowatchmoviesnow.com
Tags: HERE, Earth, WORD, bush
This video is a Neal Adams animation about his theory that the Earth is growing. This collides with the Pangea theory. Watch it, you will be amazed.
Tags: ARE, HERE, War, KNOW
nealadamsdotcom says: Limp, Man first considered Earth to be at the center of the universe, When Dinosaur fossils were first shown they were POSED like lizards with all four legs on the GROUND and tail dragging. Geologists established the preponderance of proof demanded the continents around the Atlantic were once together,…but SOMEHOW not the Pacific, The idea terrified them, because of it;s implications, We see dry rocky moons, bigger wet planets, Hydrogen GAS GIANT PLANETS and SUNS,,and we back away, terrified
This is a clip from the DVD available at www.nealadams.com
Tags: ARE, IN, War, science BouncingBarnicle says: And what is this mechanism for this supposed growing?
bignewgame says: Wouldn’t seeing that the earths crust is cracked like an egg shell show that something large & fast collided with the earth to “splash” out the moon like a water droplet? The reason why the spreading portions of the moon are facing the earth is because that side only faces the earth & is subjected to the earths pull similar to how the oceans rise & fall to a total of 22 feet each time the moon passes orbits. What effect would the earth do to the moon when the earth is 4 times it’s size?
Silicondoc says: ROFL – great job on the gravitational pull of the earth on the close side of the moon, and none on the far.
PERFECT.
You win my friend, now the question is – WHY do they resist – I will guess there is a CONSENSUS.
Hello Al Gore….anyone home ? Hellooooo
nealadamsdotcom says: enderwiggins, So the lower terrain would begin roughly circular then have bigger and bigger area, because…….? Ah, yes, on Earth ocean basins were there and the BASALT filled them in. I get it.
You are not considering ALL the information.
newoneinblack says: You don’t mention the origin of the ‘conspicuous’ crater on the opposite side that was made about 50 years after Christ died. Weren’t most of the crater free portions on this side were the EXIT wound of a meteor that went all the way through the moon. Even Roman historical records mention it, ‘the Moon was ruled by Mars’ and ‘stars falling from the sky’. Perhaps the force released of the pressure that had built within the shell of that celestial body which has never been volcanically active.
BOYKOILIEV2008 says: Costa Rica earthquake on the 8th and on the 20th and in Bodrum-Turkey on the 23th of January 2009 has been predicted.You will see more than 500 earthquake prediction for 2009.
See what earthquake happened in Colombia on the 31st of January 2009.For Colombia or Costa Rica:31st of January 2009,16h25min
/UTC/.Boyko Iliev/Consultant by earthquakes in Bulgarian bTV,”Seismograph”/
crackahcrackah says: Read more. This stuff was discovered over 100 years ago by Tesla and others. Aether/dark matter/neutrino’s/too many other names for it.
enderwiggin42 says: Erm… lava is a liquid, so of course it would flow to fill the lowest parts of the terrain.
lordcodicus says: This guy is a goon who advocates something called “Expanding Earth”. It was a hypothesis used in the late 1800′s to explain how the continents fit together so well and how fossils and minerals can be identical in different islands so far apart. Basically he says that Earth is expanding and has quadrupled in size. This gain in mass is impossible. We now know that this “Expanding Earth” hypothesis is false and that continental drift via “Plate Tectonics” is the explanation.
FreeAgain2 says: Would the pressure inside the Moon increase or decrease as it grew in size?
Has there been a recent “actual” measurement of the Moon?
This is a clip from the DVD available at www.nealadams.com – Europa
Tags: science, Earth, V, THESE pepes007 says: Yeah, sure : ), the stars might grow in size because they are made from gas, but solid planets dont grow bigger. When the cracks get wider the other end of the plate is risen forming an mountain or an ridge because planets are allmost round objects, if they were flat then they would grow.
yahoovisitor says: Science is a knowledge of what man observes happening & finalizes its rules like day & night changing seasons etc. But vice versa nature is showing changing its laws from time to time at different places. Many rivers change their track by earthquakes of different intensities. Black holes show static time or no time. These are all hints that Creator of the Universe exists and observes how his orders of becoming a human being are being followed. Man must be humane and not wild any more.
Estilum says: very nice. they fit together so perfectly, weird :]
uturniaphobic says: sure gravity would be the same but external forces would have a significant impact, I think.
A sail has the same mass up or down with different results. No air out there! agreed! just a bunch of impact material with a MORE dramatic effect in slowing and curving things.
007HaterGuyAgain says: A point to consider:If the Earth were growing the horizon distance would change correspondingly…has this occurred?
It seems that over the course of years this cardinal navigational fact would have changed and perhaps that change would have been noticed.I would be gratified if the newest internet meme turned out to be “Subduction,LOL”
nealadamsdotcom says: fritsz, I see,… the …um..universe is growing.. But…NOT the PLANETS. Where did you get this information from?
Yes, there is a THEORY of how the planets GROW.
YOU will find it at nealadamsdotcom . The Physics portion will cost $20 on a different function on the site.
ATX2012 says: fritsz, Check out kroniadotcom and the electricuniversedotcom website.
Mass and matter are not the same. I’m not sure anyone can truly explain mass. You are confusing mass with matter and they are not the same. E=MC2 is a theory.
Blacken210501 says: yeah….fossiles definitely don’t grow…
BOYKOILIEV2008 says: Costa Rica earthquake on the 8th of January 2009
has been predicted in You Tube here:BOYKOILIEV2008
You see more than 300 World earthquake prognosis
for January 2009.
The plate tectonic do not makes the earthquakes.
The moon makes the earthquakes.
Boyko Iliev
/Consultant by earthquakes in Bulgarian bTV,”Seismograph”/
bignewgame says: I agree, the whole universe is growing.
Another great video Neal.
fritsz says: Its not Growing, its jupiters gravity that’s causing the cracks.
By the way, the universe itself is growing, but not the planets.
If this growing planets/moon theory should be correct then why don’t you do more research and show HOW planets grow.. do the planets get more massive or does the density drop? explain!
Do not publish results until data is verified, this is a scientific rule.
CzarThePlezer says: Actually E=MC2 is not really considered a theory, It has already been proven. Your definition is almost a counter statement, A thoery once proven is no longer a theory from what i understand, it becomes a fact, you said it yourself, “Gravity is a theory…proven hundreds of times” WTF
This is a clip from the DVD available at www.nealadams.com Neal Adams Science Project – Mars
Tags: THIS, ARE, science, THESE myY0UTUBEchanneI says: royb673 Science/Geology/NASA says NO to subduction Zones on Mars.
nealadamsdotcom says: 21eduj Science tells you The SUN grows. And gets brighter .
13thLabyrinth says: Some additional things to say about this! Ocean fossils atop the tallest mountains in the world date back to the early Cambrian Explosion roughly 550mya. This data of the sea floor age with no subduction to be true, the early earth before the 65mya ocean bed would have to have oceans above to explain glacial dropstone & snowball earth escape. Land mustbe covered with oceans before the contenents separated. Important fossil records high atop mountains of sea floor sediments must be incorporated!
Entropy56 says: I’m still waiting for California to fall into the ocean and then for the earth too cool. Not necessarily in that order.
lordcodicus says: This guy is a goon who advocates something called “Expanding Earth”. It was a hypothesis used in the late 1800′s to explain how the continents fit together so well and how fossils and minerals can be identical in different islands so far apart. Basically he says that Earth is expanding and has quadrupled in size. This gain in mass is impossible. We now know that this “Expanding Earth” hypothesis is false and that continental drift via “Plate Tectonics” is the explanation.
21eduj says: is the sun growwing2?
Muvlonion says: it is not, but at the end of it’s lifecycle, it will grow drastically and become a red giant
crackahcrackah says: Why do you say if it once had? It seems only logical that all bodies of mass have magnetic fields. The greater the body the greater the field. This goes for both laymen’s magnetism (magneto-electric fields) and electro-static fields. The electro-static fields are what we call gravity. Perhaps the majority components of Mars result in a weaker ME field than Earth? If Earth has mostly Iron for a core I could see this… Is it known what percent of Mars is Iron or conductive metal?
bignewgame says: But Neal, doesn’t a planet have to have plants to separate the oxygen from the CO2 to make oxygen? So only planets that have plant life can have water, the rest only have hydrogen, which can fool even the experts upon examination. Hydrogen has no smell, tastes like water and freezes around the same temperature as water, so any “water” that is found on other planets could be just hydrogen without any oxygen. Hydrogen spews from the sun after a CME as imaged by the SOHO satellite.
royb673 says: i haven’t studied mars, but there is definately subduction on earth.
the rate of surface area created at spreading margins = the rate of surface area subducted
therefore no net gain in surface aerea
This is a clip from the DVD available at www.nealadams.com Neal Adams Science Project Pangea
Tags: bush, War, science, project nevets66s says: I’m assuming that this video is for entertainment purposes only and you do not really believe this is what you think really happened. If you do, give me your phone number and i’ll recommend you a really good psychiatrist. 
nealadamsdotcom says: Kaaaawa You know Geology has had 50 years to prove it;s case for Subduction,”as they see it” and have provided little or nothing.
I am willing to accept a kind of compressive subduction, that explains the lessening distances TO the “Ring of Fire”. Clearly there is a discontinuity of oceanic plate there, AND GPS has measured compression and lessening of distances.
The AMOUNT, by simple RULER MEASUREMENT is simply not enough.
Abashi76 says: At first I thought this was stuff supporting Intelligent Design,
but its actually scientific.
Kaaawa2000 says: I just did a Google Image search for “subduction”: pages and pages of drawings but no photographs…
So then I did a Google Image search for “unicorn”: pages and pages of drawings but no photographs…
Sorry to be sarcastic but I’m watching the History Channel’s “How the Earth was Made” right now. Great budget but it should be on the Comedy Channel.
They just showed Australia “crashing” into California and they overdubbed a crashing sound.
brilliant
Resa124 says: The Earth Is Not Growing. If It Was We Would Be Dead. The Plates In The Earth Are Moving, This Is Called “Plate Tectonics” , This Caused The Movement Of ” Pangea” Not The Earth Growing. Plate Tectonics Are Also The Reason For Earthquakes.
NO SHIT!!!! You Learn This In Freaking 4th Grade
Beelzeboogie says: No, it REALLY isn’t.
jffryfnt says: Bullshite. Climb a mountain in the Andes mountains and you can SEE subduction for yourself. Furthermore, volcanoes are purely a characteristic of subduction. VOLATILES (volcanoes, coincidence??) are released when they are heated after being SUBDUCTED under the Earth’s crust.
infuago22 says: that’s the point of this video in case you couldn’t figure it out. not everything we learn is true.
Neal Adams Science project – A video clip translated from German Television.
Tags: science, ADULT, HERE, Earth Blondets1 says: What if the earth’s mantle and or core which has heavier elements is fissioning into lighter elements. The lighter elements will take up more space as there less dense now. Well just my Idea on what could produce a growing earth. Though it does raise another idea on what the gravity would have been? has the field strength been constant or has gravity been getting weaker? With a smaller surface and being closer to the center of gravity the pull would be enormous!
nealadamsdotcom says: Blondets There is no such process as de-densing. Earth GROWS, by creating new matter, just like the sun does. Gravity constantly gets stronger. This is why upper weight of animals gets less and less.
satanisthetruegod666 says: “from new mass creation”…. yeah…. no, he proposes that the new matter comes from pair production which has it’s own problems. However, he maintains that the matter is made in the center of the earth which he maintains is plasma (though we know it isn’t, it’s iron/nickel) so I ask, how did the water get to the surface?
and if you actually studied cosmology you’d know the big bang has more scienific credence than this ever will.
isafos says: Big bang is an idiots theory; as opposed to ‘god’?
You’re not very nice, are you?
lordcodicus says: This guy is a goon who advocates something called “Expanding Earth”. It was a hypothesis used in the late 1800′s to explain how the continents fit together so well and how fossils and minerals can be identical in different islands so far apart. Basically he says that Earth is expanding and has quadrupled in size. This gain in mass is impossible. We now know that this “Expanding Earth” hypothesis is false and that continental drift via “Plate Tectonics” is the explanation.
DonHoraldo says: every particle is energetic but the lack of particles means it’s cold. works just like you fridge.
GMBCATASTROPHE says: You are getting confused between the Corona and the Thermosphere. We are talking about the corona fatty. And your argument is irrelevant and idiotic in any case. Because the fact of the matter is joules, that is to say ENERGY, will flow from hotter to colder materials. Thats a LAW OF PHYSICS fatty. Its never contradicted. We measure what is hotter and what is colder via TEMPERATURE. And so that therefore the suns surface cannot be heating the corona. It MUST be the other way around.
Synchronicitical says: Just so you know, we don’t know that the core is iron/nickel – it’s just the current theory that makes some sense in describing seismic data and magnetic fields – nobody has actually checked.
Also, the Big Bang has a “hard swallow” like every other cosmogonic theory. The theory is that everything sprung into existence, for no reason, in an instant. Terence McKenna called this science’s “one free miracle”… because if you trust consensus on that, you’re bound to believe a whole lot more.
seedstyler says: neither a “Conspiracy of Science”, in Europe it´s a common fact and widley discussed about growing earth, it´s just there is no evidence…
Let it be clearly seen what this altudious really amounts to now. Incorrect insults and calls for death, his scientific method of argument.
Take a long look in the mirror there feller, and maybe you can figure out why what Neal has presented has far more credibilty than a single phrase you”ve typed, and is so far above your capability and comprehension, and frankly disnisses your clingly, childiash fundamentalist belief in the prior falsehoods.
You’re exactly what you whined about others.
nashertheathiest As a religionest, you clearly believe in magical answers like BIG BANG and PANGEA THEORY and Rogue Planets ripping 2/3′s of the crust off of Earth and making a moon out of it.
NASA, however disagrees with you and says these are TECTONIC in NATURE.
Oceans are immaterial for any tectonic requirement except for instantly cooling new oceanic plate material. YOU, ARE INCREDIBLY UNINFORMED.
because there was more oxygen is there air, more o2 more things grow…though the gravity thing is a good idea
This response marks the very last iota of my time that you will waste.
I hope you *are* 25. If you’re not, and are in fact significantly older, then you have lived for many more years as an imbecilic moron than I feared – and your poor use of punctuation is even more reprehensible.
Re. bus: Just before you mistakenly meld the phrase “shut up” into a single yelled word for the first time, you imply that fundamentalism is a good thing. This reassures me that society would not mourn your passing.
Hi! Your theory is extremely seducing and elegant, however I find the twisting of alaska somehow suspicious. If alask was twisted under syberia, how come it created no unsignificant mountain ranges at the north of alaska when it got untwisted?
Neal, I applaud your videos! 5 stars all the way friend! The truth feels so much better on the soul.
Mars has no plate tectonics. This is because it has no oceans, which are a requirement for subduction to occur.
This Neal person provides no evidence whatsoever to back up the claim that the gash on Mars’ surface is a recent scar.